All Discussions Tagged 'near' - Boolean Strings Network2024-03-28T23:38:33Zhttps://booleanstrings.ning.com/forum/topic/listForTag?tag=near&feed=yes&xn_auth=noBING VS Google - NEAR VS AROUND - LinkedIn XRay Searchingtag:booleanstrings.ning.com,2011-03-18:2748775:Topic:597382011-03-18T10:41:14.282ZSarang Brahmehttps://booleanstrings.ning.com/profile/sarangbrahme1
<p>Recently I've started digging more into Bing X-Ray searching while working on Glen's challenge.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In my opinion NEAR works much better than AROUND.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Bing:</p>
<p>site:uk.linkedin.com sourcing NEAR:8 capgemini</p>
<p>62 results</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Google:</p>
<p>site:uk.linkedin.com "sourcing" AROUND(8) capgemini</p>
<p>10k+ results</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Most of the BING results are good while Google results are not accurate. In fact, even if you remove AROUND operator -…</p>
<p>Recently I've started digging more into Bing X-Ray searching while working on Glen's challenge.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In my opinion NEAR works much better than AROUND.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Bing:</p>
<p>site:uk.linkedin.com sourcing NEAR:8 capgemini</p>
<p>62 results</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Google:</p>
<p>site:uk.linkedin.com "sourcing" AROUND(8) capgemini</p>
<p>10k+ results</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Most of the BING results are good while Google results are not accurate. In fact, even if you remove AROUND operator - number of results still remain same.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Any comments?</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>