Need help with the search string

[Chandra Buduri]

Need help with the search string in various search engines.

We are looking for SAP CRM 7.0 Service Management Technical Consultant

Position: SAP CRM 7.0 Service Management Technical Consultant
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Duration: 3 +Months

Required Skills:
SAP CRM 7.0 Technical Consultant
Experience with SAP CRM 7.0 * Service Management
Candidate mush have expertise in Technical aspects

Thanks
Chandra Buduri

[gary cozin]

The following string brought back good results:

In GOOGLE, copy:

site:linkedin.com "sap crm" "greater philadelphia area" (inurl:pub | inurl:in) -intitle:directory

Gary

[Chandra Buduri]

HI Gary,
It seems you're expert in identifying candidates on LinkedIn by X-RAYING them.
I have seen your other replies too, totally focused on LinkedIn
Can you help me out with a boolean search to do on google/yahoo or any other search engine not using linkedIn

Thanks for your help
With best wishes
Chandra Buduri

gary cozin said:

The following string brought back good results:

In GOOGLE, copy:

site:linkedin.com "sap crm" "greater philadelphia area" (inurl:pub | inurl:in) -intitle:directory

Gary

[gary cozin]

Chandra,

I always get very clean, accurate and precise results xraying LI for profiles using Google vs generating other strings. It gives me the "least" noise-The string I gave you for LI profile produced excellent results so not sure why you wouldn't use it-

Here's an example of a general string for Google not xraying LI:

(inurl:resume | intitle:resume) sap crm (215 | 267 | 610 | 484) (pa | philadelphia) -job -jobs -apply -submit -careers -eoe

If you insert "SAP CRM" in quotes you get even less. I chose to use area codes & state vs zip codes - but you can try with 19102..19195 which is the Philadelphia area zip range that Google accepts;

What's interesting is that if you remove the Philadelphia area codes & state in the string, you get a ton more results - not sure why there aren't more people using SAP CRM in that area however;

Try this w/o location for example:
(inurl:resume | intitle:resume) "sap crm" -job -jobs -apply -submit -careers -eoe-job -jobs -apply -submit -careers -eoe

You can also add (implement | design | configure) to the string but you would get much less;

You can also play with (inurl:~resume | intitle:~resume) or add (inurl:cv | intitle:cv)

You can also try that string in Yahoo & Bing - but Bing doesn't take the inurl command-

I still believe the string for LI gave the best results-

Gary

[Chandra Buduri]

HI Gary,
What you said is correct if I search with LinkedIn I might get better results.
But if you want to approach any of the prospective candidate on Linkedin either you should have premium account to send inmails about the project or somehow the candidate should be in your 1st/2nd degree network.

Anyhow thanks for your suggestions and the search string.

Have a nice day and Thanks
Chandra Buduri

gary cozin said:

Chandra,

I always get very clean, accurate and precise results xraying LI for profiles using Google vs generating other strings. It gives me the "least" noise-The string I gave you for LI profile produced excellent results so not sure why you wouldn't use it-

Here's an example of a general string for Google not xraying LI:

(inurl:resume | intitle:resume) sap crm (215 | 267 | 610 | 484) (pa | philadelphia) -job -jobs -apply -submit -careers -eoe

If you insert "SAP CRM" in quotes you get even less. I chose to use area codes & state vs zip codes - but you can try with 19102..19195 which is the Philadelphia area zip range that Google accepts;

What's interesting is that if you remove the Philadelphia area codes & state in the string, you get a ton more results - not sure why there aren't more people using SAP CRM in that area however;

Try this w/o location for example:
(inurl:resume | intitle:resume) "sap crm" -job -jobs -apply -submit -careers -eoe-job -jobs -apply -submit -careers -eoe

You can also add (implement | design | configure) to the string but you would get much less;

You can also play with (inurl:~resume | intitle:~resume) or add (inurl:cv | intitle:cv)

You can also try that string in Yahoo & Bing - but Bing doesn't take the inurl command-

I still believe the string for LI gave the best results-

Gary

[Shannon Myers]

Hi Chandra

I'm not sure if you are working from the corporate side or 3rd party recruiter so how much compliance is a factor however I know I usually do not contact through InMail on LinkedIn but direct even if I find them on LI. If you need assistance taking it a step further when you get a name or profile let me know and I'd be happy to help. One of the first places I jump to is jigsaw.com but there are many techniques and sites to take it a step further.

Shannon

[Manick Paul]

Chandra,

Please try this on Google and try to play with this

(inurl:resume | intitle:resume | intitle:CV | inurl:CV | intitle:curriculum vitae | inurl:curriculum vitae) sap crm (215 | 267 | 610 | 484) (pa | philadelphia) -job -jobs -apply -submit -careers -eoe -"resume services"


Regards
Manick

[gary cozin]

Chandra,

Yes contact info on LI can be hidden, but there are email addresses or websites to get contact info on them. You can look them up on various sites such as Jigsaw.com ( as Shannon mentioned); pipl.com, wink.com and many others. You can also search for their company email format by inserting "email * * companyname.com" in Google. Just replace the companyname with their actual company name & use quotes the way I have it-

Have fun!

Chandra Sekhar Buduri said:

HI Gary,
What you said is correct if I search with LinkedIn I might get better results.
But if you want to approach any of the prospective candidate on Linkedin either you should have premium account to send inmails about the project or somehow the candidate should be in your 1st/2nd degree network.

Anyhow thanks for your suggestions and the search string.

Have a nice day and Thanks
Chandra Buduri

gary cozin said:

Chandra,

I always get very clean, accurate and precise results xraying LI for profiles using Google vs generating other strings. It gives me the "least" noise-The string I gave you for LI profile produced excellent results so not sure why you wouldn't use it-

Here's an example of a general string for Google not xraying LI:

(inurl:resume | intitle:resume) sap crm (215 | 267 | 610 | 484) (pa | philadelphia) -job -jobs -apply -submit -careers -eoe

If you insert "SAP CRM" in quotes you get even less. I chose to use area codes & state vs zip codes - but you can try with 19102..19195 which is the Philadelphia area zip range that Google accepts;

What's interesting is that if you remove the Philadelphia area codes & state in the string, you get a ton more results - not sure why there aren't more people using SAP CRM in that area however;

Try this w/o location for example:
(inurl:resume | intitle:resume) "sap crm" -job -jobs -apply -submit -careers -eoe-job -jobs -apply -submit -careers -eoe

You can also add (implement | design | configure) to the string but you would get much less;

You can also play with (inurl:~resume | intitle:~resume) or add (inurl:cv | intitle:cv)

You can also try that string in Yahoo & Bing - but Bing doesn't take the inurl command-

I still believe the string for LI gave the best results-

Gary